TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

[LiuBei]

Originally Posted by exo777

https://sglonelyguy.online/xiao-qing-massage/

FR:

Service-wise I'd say Xiao Qing is one of the better ones now. Not say very chio but sultry CFM looks. Probably in her late 20s. Body is quite fit/tight with smooth skin (small boobs though). Non-existent massage but XQ has the skills for the sensual and makes an effort to please. Classic JS-style. polished customer service. However, the location sucks.

Agree with this. She will hai di lao yue you while glomping on your lil bro. And at the same time, using the free hand to play with your nipple.. the sensation is damn good especially with her tongue action on your dick.. sibei shiok

[Angellover]

Originally Posted by barrysteakfries

Everyone has a Tier 1 in their own heart.

Yes bro, however if need to justify tier 1 here then will require certain criteria that most people will agree upon

I assume tier 2 here is based on 100% positive FR

[kaixin82]

Originally Posted by Angellover

Yes bro, however if need to justify tier 1 here then will require certain criteria that most people will agree upon

I assume tier 2 here is based on 100% positive FR

maybe something like

>=10 positive MRs = Tier 1

from 6 to 9 positive MRs = Tier 2

from 3 to 5 positive MRs = Tier 3

Between 1 to 2 positive MRs = Tier 4

More negatives than positives = Tier 5

only count the MR if its posted by a genuine contributor.
1 negative MR = -1 point

just a thought.

[James67]

Originally Posted by GimliTheBigD

wa bro u 1 day go two ML?

No lah. TT will my first session with her. Confirmed slot.
Not yet go.
Just done Xin Er recently.

[barrysteakfries]

Originally Posted by kaixin82

maybe something like

>=10 positive MRs = Tier 1

from 6 to 9 positive MRs = Tier 2

from 3 to 5 positive MRs = Tier 3

Between 1 to 2 positive MRs = Tier 4

More negatives than positives = Tier 5

only count the MR if its posted by a genuine contributor.
1 negative MR = -1 point

just a thought.

Abit tedious to administer like that. It should be simple enougj so that it is sustainable. The person is doing it out of goodwill. Too much will burnout.

[James67]

Originally Posted by James67

No lah. TT will my first session with her. Confirmed slot.
Not yet go.
Just done Xin Er recently.

At least TT is professional enough to text me regarding my change of session with her.
Will post FR after my session.

[SMRTLTD]

Originally Posted by Ahh_Boi

Ya, I also 2 hands 2 legs will vote for her. haha.

But like you said, some people may like vanilla cat (Zoya, An Ran, etc) so it's really hard to say.
Even tho I also find vanilla cat a bit not value for moolah (Since I no charm to unlock anything) but then, my mother always scold me, 不要每次只吃肉，也要记得吃菜！

Simi hands legs lol.. Only 1 body part to rule them all - your kkj.. No kkj no chionging..

My personal opinion is do away with all of those ranking/tier systems.. Let the reader decide which ML to go for based on the available info.. This also avoids the trap of someone choosing the ML based solely on the number of positive FRs, but his experience may not mirror them.. A negative for someone may be a positive for someone else..

At the end of the day, the main aim of the thread is consolidation, so keep it simple and controversial-free..

[SLRR]

Originally Posted by SMRTLTD

Bro really appreciate your efforts to go about this painstaking and gargantuan task.. What I actually prefer is the thread not having too many segregated posts, as it’s unreadable and cluttered to the eye to a certain extent..

What I’d do is to consolidate all the ML names into a single post, according to alphabetical order, or split them into 2-3 posts, i.e. A-I, J-R and so on.. Then under each name will have sub categories of positive/negative/neutral FRs and status (active/inactive/delisted), with the url link.. For e.g,

ML A
www.slg.com/ml-a-massage
Status: Active

Positive FRs:
FR 1 url
FR 2 url

Negative FRs:
FR 3 url
FR 4 url

Neutral FRs:
FR 5 url

Ranking the MLs by their number of positive/negative/neutral FRs will be extremely challenging due to the fluid and dynamic nature of them, and very time-consuming for you to monitor and adjust accordingly.. Besides, this eliminates any form of headaches needed to justify or set certain criterias for someone to belong to a particular group/tier..

My 2 cents..

Lao uncle agree with this approach, doing the tier ranking will only kill yourself because of the detailed discussion. Let bros here decide by themselves...

I think it will be better if you can just list down the positives and negatives into probably + or -

ML's name (URL)
+
positive URL (URL)

-
negative URL (URL)

Neutral
neutral URL (URL)

[SLRR]

Originally Posted by SMRTLTD

Bro really appreciate your efforts to go about this painstaking and gargantuan task.. What I actually prefer is the thread not having too many segregated posts, as it’s unreadable and cluttered to the eye to a certain extent..

What I’d do is to consolidate all the ML names into a single post, according to alphabetical order, or split them into 2-3 posts, i.e. A-I, J-R and so on.. Then under each name will have sub categories of positive/negative/neutral FRs and status (active/inactive/delisted), with the url link.. For e.g,

ML A
www.slg.com/ml-a-massage
Status: Active

Positive FRs:
FR 1 url
FR 2 url

Negative FRs:
FR 3 url
FR 4 url

Neutral FRs:
FR 5 url

Ranking the MLs by their number of positive/negative/neutral FRs will be extremely challenging due to the fluid and dynamic nature of them, and very time-consuming for you to monitor and adjust accordingly.. Besides, this eliminates any form of headaches needed to justify or set certain criterias for someone to belong to a particular group/tier..

My 2 cents..

hahaha, we had the same thoughts

[kaixin82]

Originally Posted by barrysteakfries

Abit tedious to administer like that. It should be simple enougj so that it is sustainable. The person is doing it out of goodwill. Too much will burnout.

cool. start small and assess first

[SMRTLTD]

Originally Posted by SLRR

hahaha, we had the same thoughts

While the tables look a neat way to tabulate and display data, it's actually distracting and "harder" to process for me.. My preference is just simple line breaks/paragraphing while scrolling up and down..

Also when posting url links, make it open on a new tab so the user doesn't have click on the back button repeatedly (or right click to open new tabs which is extra work).. More convenient this way, IMO..

[Franco_Barsei]

Failsafe method is doing due diligence using the search function with name of WL.

Writers of FRs please spell out WL's name in FULL instead of the XX, YY etc nonsense. And provide the link please.

[iwasanoobonce]

Originally Posted by Stenzer

pretty viet lady?

Lol 130 30 min you want? If 90 i still can mian qiang

[iwasanoobonce]

Originally Posted by ShittyAss

Dont think or count....u will wished u pcc instead n kept all those money...

Ya lo, i also lost count how many lives i changed, busted my pocket before, now need to control, maybe max 1.5k per month

[SMRTLTD]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

Failsafe method is doing due diligence using the search function with name of WL.

Writers of FRs please spell out WL's name in FULL instead of the XX, YY etc nonsense. And provide the link please.

The advanced search function is actually a very powerful tool, but not many choose to learn to use it effectively..

Anyway there's no way you can 100% enforce people to write FRs at a certain standard, so have to put up with this inconvenience and do your due diligence before pulling the trigger on a ML..